ArticleScientific reports2025
Short-term cone beam CT study on bone mass changes post touch-controlled minimally invasive mandibular molar implant.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Volumetric buccal bone alterations at immediate implant sites with or without soft tissue augmentation: A 6-month assessment.Journal of periodontology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the change of peri-implant bone mass after touch-controlled, minimally invasive implantation in the mandibular first molar region by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). A retrospective study was conducted, involving 60 implants in the mandibular first molar region. Touch-controlled, minimally invasive implantation was performed, and healing abutments were installed after surgery. CBCT scans were obtained at four time points: on the day of surgery (T0) and at 1 month (T1) and 6 months (T2) after surgery. Implant retention, as well as horizontal and vertical bone absorption, both bucco-lingually and in the proximal and distal regions, was measured at each time point. The implant retention at T2 was 100%. Bone resorption was observed at the proximal and distal sites of the implant as early as at T1, with more noticeable resorption at T2. Compared with T1, there was a significant increase in bone resorption, and the resorption amount tended to stabilize by T2. Horizontal bone resorption was not evident. Briefly, following touch-controlled, minimally invasive implantation of mandibular first molars, peri-implant vertical bone resorption was observed in the proximal, distal, and bucco-lingual regions, while horizontal bone resorption was not apparent. These findings provide valuable guidance for implant clinicians in selecting optimal surgical techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.