Observational studyBMJ open2025
What laparoscopic skills are necessary for the certificate of completion of training? A prospective nationwide cross-sectional survey of obstetrics and gynaecology and general surgery trainees and consultants in the UK.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05116332 (Comparing the Variation in Laparoscopic Skills Acquisition in Obstetrics & Gynaecology and General Surgical Trainees.), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparing the Variation in Laparoscopic Skills Acquisition in Obstetrics & Gynaecology and General Surgical Trainees. (LAGGS Study)
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality Assurance in Laparoscopic Gynecological Training: A Narrative Review of Standards with a Multicenter Expert Perspective on Pathways Toward Effective Education and Care.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Trainees Face Higher Musculoskeletal Demands than General Surgery Trainees in Simulated Laparoscopic Tasks-An Observational Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the views of obstetrics and gynaecology (O&G) and general surgery (GS) trainees and consultants on the laparoscopic skills considered necessary to achieve the certificate of completion of training (CCT) and identify any mismatch between consultants and trainees in their expectations of these skills.
designA prospective nationwide cross-sectional study in the UK.
settingA national survey distributed through Health Education, England and national training bodies such as the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy and the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland.
participantsO&G and GS consultants and specialty trainees in O&G and GS. Specialty trainees below ST3 level and consultants performing open surgery or minor laparoscopic surgery only were excluded.
interventionsTrainees completed a 27-item questionnaire on their training characteristics, rated their confidence and perceived importance of 10 laparoscopic skills required for CCT using a 5-point Likert scale. Consultants answered a 36-item questionnaire on their demographic details, their views on the importance of the same 10 laparoscopic skills, their confidence and the standard of laparoscopic skills they observed among trainees approaching CCT.
results345 participants responded to the questionnaire: 117 O&G trainees, 95 O&G consultants, 57 GS trainees and 76 GS consultants. O&G trainees and consultants expected similar laparoscopic skills required for CCT for all 10 skills (p>0.050), while GS consultants had higher expectations of GS trainees for use of endovascular devices (p<0.05), suturing (p<0.01) and staplers (p<0.05). Consultants in both specialties observed that trainees were performing significantly below the expected standards; p<0.010 (O&G) and p<0.001 (GS) for all 10 listed skills. O&G trainees reported lower confidence than GS trainees for all 10 laparoscopic skills, p<0.001.
conclusionsThis nationwide study showed that UK O&G trainees and consultants both agree on the skills required for CCT, but GS consultants had higher expectations than their trainees. Trainees in GS were more confident in their surgical skills than those in O&G. However, consultants in both specialities believed that trainees were not achieving the requisite laparoscopic skills required for CCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05116332.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.