Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40157730›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2025

Temporal trends in hospitalisations for venous thromboembolic events in England: a population-level analysis.

Mark Hughes, Mark D Russell, Ritika Roy, Daksh Mehta, Sam Norton, Fabiola Atzeni, James B Galloway

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark HughesCentre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4139-4717
Mark D RussellCentre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8171-7772
Ritika RoyCentre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1885-1316
Daksh MehtaCentre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK.
Sam NortonPsychology Department, Insitute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
Fabiola AtzeniRheumatology Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
James B GallowayCentre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK james.galloway@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1230-2781

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe temporal trends in hospitalisation episodes for venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) in England, and compare hospitalisation rates for pulmonary emboli (PEs) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

methodsRetrospective observational study.

settingSecondary care in England, UK, between April 1998 and March 2022.

participantsIndividuals with hospitalisations for VTE recorded in the NHS Digital Hospital Episode Statistics dataset. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was temporal trends in hospitalisation episodes for PE, DVT and VTE overall between 1 April 1998 and 31 March 2022. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of all-cause hospital admissions that were due to VTE; the proportion of all VTE hospitalisations that were recorded as primary admission diagnoses; the male/female split in hospitalisation episodes for VTE; and temporal changes in hospitalisation rates by age.

resultsBetween 1998 and 2022, hospitalisations for VTE increased by 62.6%, from 109.5 to 178.1 per 100 000 population. This was driven by a 202% increase in hospitalisations for PE (from 40.4 to 122.2 per 100 000 population). In contrast, hospitalisations for DVT decreased by 19.1% over this period (from 69.1 to 55.9 per 100 000 population). Overall, VTE remained stable as a proportion of all-cause hospital admissions between 1998/1999 and 2019/2020 (0.45% and 0.43%, respectively), before increasing after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in England (0.59% in 2020/2021 and 0.51% in 2021/2022).

conclusionHospitalisations for VTE increased markedly in England between 1998 and 2022, driven by large increases in hospitalisations for PE. In contrast, hospitalisations for DVT decreased overall, which may reflect the success of primary care DVT management pathways. Our findings suggest that preventative measures are needed to reduce the incidence of hospitalisations for PE.

Indexed as

HospitalizationPulmonary EmbolismVenous ThromboembolismVenous ThrombosisAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19EnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultCOVID-19EPIDEMIOLOGYPrimary Health CarePUBLIC HEALTHRHEUMATOLOGYThromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID40157730
PMCPMC11956333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.