ArticlePreventive medicine2025
The associations of long working hours and unhealthy diet with cardiometabolic outcomes and mortality in US workers.
Article in Preventive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Health and Environmental Impacts, Safety, and Affordability of the EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet: A Multidisciplinary Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Pooled it
- Long working hours and mortality outcomes: A systematic review with outcome-specific evidence synthesis.iScience · 2026Article
- Dietary quality across the life course and metabolic syndrome: evidence from two decades of follow-up in rural China young adults.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo examine independent and joint associations of long working hours (LWH) and EAT-Lancet diet with cardiometabolic outcomes and mortality in US workers.
methodsThis prospective cohort included US workers from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, with cross-sectional baseline data from 1999 to March 2020. A subsample of participants from 1999 to 2018 was linked to the National Death Index, with mortality follow-up through December 2019. The independent and joint associations of LWH (≥ 55 vs. < 55 h/week) and EAT-Lancet diet scores (low vs. high) with cardiometabolic outcomes and mortality were estimated using multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively.
resultsLWH was associated with higher odds of obesity (OR = 1.20; 95%CI = 1.07, 1.34) among all workers and higher CVD mortality among workers with high CVD risk at baseline (HR = 1.64, 95%CI = 0.79, 3.12). Low diet scores were associated with higher odds of obesity (OR = 1.34, 95%CI = 1.21, 1.42) and diabetes (OR = 1.33, 95%CI = 1.01, 1.76) among all workers. Working hours and diet scores were jointly associated with obesity and CVD mortality, indicating by the relative excess risk due to interaction greater than zero among all workers.
conclusionsLWH and unhealthy diet are independent risk factors and may interact to exacerbate adverse cardiometabolic health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.