ArticleHematological oncology2025
Detection of Hematological Malignancies Using N-NOSE (Nematode-NOSE).
Article in Hematological oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Manual and Fully Automated Chemotaxis-Based Cancer Screening Yield Equivalent Performance: A Nine-Month Real-World, Side-by-Side Study of the N-NOSE Workflow.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Olfactory Science and Technology in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: From Invertebrate Models to Artificial Intelligence.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hematological malignancies often lack defined risk factors and present with non-specific symptoms, underscoring the urgent need for simple and reliable detection methods. To address this challenge, Hirotsu et al. innovated N-NOSE, a novel, non-invasive cancer screening test that utilizes the chemotaxis response of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans to detect tumor-related odors in urine. In this clinical study, we assessed the performance of N-NOSE in patients with various hematological malignancies at diagnosis and during treatment. Urine samples were collected from 30 healthy individuals and 89 patients, including those with leukemia (n = 13), malignant lymphoma (n = 53), multiple myeloma (n = 15), primary AL amyloidosis (n = 3), Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (n = 2), myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 2), and blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (n = 1). Based on the optimal cut-off values in detecting hematological malignancies, N-NOSE demonstrated high positivity rates in treatment-naïve patients: leukemia and multiple myeloma were very high (over 90%), whereas malignant lymphoma was slightly lower than 80%. In the small subset of malignant lymphoma patients who tested N-NOSE-negative, confounding factors included steroid administration and hemodialysis. Importantly, no significant correlation emerged between N-NOSE index values and baseline characteristics or comorbidities other than the presence of cancer. Moreover, in all 32 patients who achieved clinical response following chemotherapy, the N-NOSE index declined, reflecting disease status. These findings highlight N-NOSE's strong potential as a sensitive, non-invasive screening tool for hematological malignancies-particularly multiple myeloma-and support its use in initial detection and monitoring of therapeutic response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.