ArticleIET systems biology
TNFR-LSTM: A Deep Intelligent Model for Identification of Tumour Necroses Factor Receptor (TNFR) Activity.
Article in IET systems biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumour necrosis factors (TNFs) are key players in processes such as inflammation, cancer development, and autoimmune diseases. However, accurately identifying TNFs remains challenging because of their complex interactions with other cytokines. Although existing machine learning models offer some potential, they often fall short in reliably distinguishing TNFs. To address this issue, the authors developed DEEP-TNFR, a more advanced model designed specifically to predict TNFR activity. The approach incorporates features such as relative and reverse positions, along with statistical moments, and is tested on a recognised benchmark dataset. The authors explored six different deep learning classifiers, including fully connected networks (FCN), convolutional neural networks (CNN), simple RNN (RNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), and gated recurrent units (GRU). The model's effectiveness was evaluated through multiple methods: self-consistency, independent set testing, and 5- and 10-fold cross-validation, using metrics, such as accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and Matthews correlation coefficient. Among these classifiers, LSTM proved to be the most effective, outperforming the others and setting a new standard compared to previous studies. DEEP-TNFR is poised to significantly support ongoing research by enhancing the accuracy of TNFR identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.