Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40156875›Full record

ArticleIET systems biology

TNFR-LSTM: A Deep Intelligent Model for Identification of Tumour Necroses Factor Receptor (TNFR) Activity.

Faisal Binzagr, Ansar Naseem, Muhammad Umer Farooq, Nashwan Alromema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IET systems biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Faisal BinzagrDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology-Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh, Saudi Arabia.
Ansar NaseemDepartment of Software Engineering, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Umer FarooqDepartment of Computer Science, School of Systems and Technology, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
Nashwan AlromemaDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology-Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6208-2863

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 1339-830-2024King Abdulaziz University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumour necrosis factors (TNFs) are key players in processes such as inflammation, cancer development, and autoimmune diseases. However, accurately identifying TNFs remains challenging because of their complex interactions with other cytokines. Although existing machine learning models offer some potential, they often fall short in reliably distinguishing TNFs. To address this issue, the authors developed DEEP-TNFR, a more advanced model designed specifically to predict TNFR activity. The approach incorporates features such as relative and reverse positions, along with statistical moments, and is tested on a recognised benchmark dataset. The authors explored six different deep learning classifiers, including fully connected networks (FCN), convolutional neural networks (CNN), simple RNN (RNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), and gated recurrent units (GRU). The model's effectiveness was evaluated through multiple methods: self-consistency, independent set testing, and 5- and 10-fold cross-validation, using metrics, such as accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and Matthews correlation coefficient. Among these classifiers, LSTM proved to be the most effective, outperforming the others and setting a new standard compared to previous studies. DEEP-TNFR is poised to significantly support ongoing research by enhancing the accuracy of TNFR identification.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDeep LearningModels, BiologicalReceptors, Tumor Necrosis FactorHumansNeural Networks, ComputerReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factorartificial intelligencemedical diagnostic computingneural nets

Identifiers

PMID40156875
PMCPMC11954562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.