Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40156770›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2025

The Australian Diagnostic Criteria for Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy.

Frederick P Mariajoseph, Leon T Lai, Adrian Praeger, Ronil V Chandra, Justin Moore, Hamed Asadi, Laetitia de Villiers, Tony Goldschlager, Calvin Gan, Kevin Zhou and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Severe contrast-induced encephalopathy with permanent motor dysfunction following secondary ioversol exposure.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Frederick P MariajosephMonash University, Melbourne , Australia. frederick.mariajoseph@gmail.com.
Leon T LaiMonash University, Melbourne , Australia.
Adrian PraegerMonash University, Melbourne , Australia.
Ronil V ChandraMonash University, Melbourne , Australia.
Justin MooreMonash University, Melbourne , Australia.
Hamed AsadiAustin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Laetitia de VilliersGold Coast Hospital, Southport, Australia.
Tony GoldschlagerMonash University, Melbourne , Australia.
Calvin GanMonash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Kevin ZhouMonash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Albert Ho Yuen ChiuSir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Ferdinand MiteffHunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, Australia.
Ramon Martin BanezRoyal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia.
Thanh PhanMonash University, Melbourne , Australia.
Davor Pavlin-PremrlAustin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Winston ChongMonash University, Melbourne , Australia.
Sophie DunkertonRoyal Brisbane and Women'S Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Anoop MadanAlfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Lee-Anne SlaterMonash University, Melbourne , Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionContrast-induced encephalopathy (CIE) is a recognised complication of contrast administration, however diagnosis remains challenging due to its symptom overlap with other neurological conditions and the absence of formal diagnostic criteria.

methodsA modified Delphi study was performed. Consultant physicians with active clinical experience with CIE patients were invited from neurovascular centres in Australia. Initial diagnostic items were derived from an extensive literature review and analysis of local institutional cases across Australia. Three Delphi rounds were conducted. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement.

resultsSeventeen neurovascular specialists from nine neurovascular centres participated (81.0% response rate) between May 2024 and July 2024. In round 1, 15 diagnostic items were presented to participants, which were revised and one additional criteria suggested. In round 2, 14/16 diagnostic items achieved consensus. In round three 14/14 items achieved consensus. Ultimately, a 14-item diagnostic criteria was developed based on participant consensus. The absolute criteria exclude CIE if symptom onset is more than 24 h after contrast administration, or if symptoms can be explained by vessel occlusion/territory ischaemia, intracranial haemorrhage, epilepsy, metabolic derangement, intracranial malignancy or head trauma. The supporting criteria indicate that CIE is more probable if symptoms are reversible, correspond with the distribution of contrast administration, or are associated with reversible contrast staining, cerebral oedema or cortical/subcortical MRI signal change.

conclusionThis study proposes a 14-item diagnostic criteria for CIE based on expert consensus in Australia. Further research is needed to refine CIE as a clinical entity.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesContrast MediaAustraliaConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingContrast MediaAdverse eventComplicationContrastDiagnosisEncephalopathyEndovascularNeurotoxicity

Identifiers

PMID40156770
PMCPMC12125082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.