ArticleNeuroradiology2025
The Australian Diagnostic Criteria for Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Severe contrast-induced encephalopathy with permanent motor dysfunction following secondary ioversol exposure.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Late-Onset Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy After Stent-Assisted Coiling: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Contrast-induced encephalopathy presenting with refractory status epilepticus following endovascular coiling of an intracranial aneurysm: A case report and literature review.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- Delayed non ischemic cerebral enhancing lesions after endovascular stent assisted coiling of an unruptured intracranial aneurysm, a case description followed by a literature analysis on the probable causes, differential diagnosis and treatment.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionContrast-induced encephalopathy (CIE) is a recognised complication of contrast administration, however diagnosis remains challenging due to its symptom overlap with other neurological conditions and the absence of formal diagnostic criteria.
methodsA modified Delphi study was performed. Consultant physicians with active clinical experience with CIE patients were invited from neurovascular centres in Australia. Initial diagnostic items were derived from an extensive literature review and analysis of local institutional cases across Australia. Three Delphi rounds were conducted. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement.
resultsSeventeen neurovascular specialists from nine neurovascular centres participated (81.0% response rate) between May 2024 and July 2024. In round 1, 15 diagnostic items were presented to participants, which were revised and one additional criteria suggested. In round 2, 14/16 diagnostic items achieved consensus. In round three 14/14 items achieved consensus. Ultimately, a 14-item diagnostic criteria was developed based on participant consensus. The absolute criteria exclude CIE if symptom onset is more than 24 h after contrast administration, or if symptoms can be explained by vessel occlusion/territory ischaemia, intracranial haemorrhage, epilepsy, metabolic derangement, intracranial malignancy or head trauma. The supporting criteria indicate that CIE is more probable if symptoms are reversible, correspond with the distribution of contrast administration, or are associated with reversible contrast staining, cerebral oedema or cortical/subcortical MRI signal change.
conclusionThis study proposes a 14-item diagnostic criteria for CIE based on expert consensus in Australia. Further research is needed to refine CIE as a clinical entity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.