Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40156733›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025

Post-operative infection following ankle fracture surgery: a current concepts review.

Jasper Tausendfreund, Jens Halm, Erik Tanis, Michael Swords, Tim Schepers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tissue barriers · 2026
    Article
  5. Functional outcome in mini-fragment plating of the fibula in unstable ankle fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jasper TausendfreundTrauma Unit, Noordwest Hospital Group, Wilhelminalaan 12, 1815 JD, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8479-9076
Jens HalmTrauma Unit, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3649-0609
Erik TanisTrauma Unit, Noordwest Hospital Group, Wilhelminalaan 12, 1815 JD, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4361-8085
Michael SwordsMichigan Orthopedic Center, University of Michigan Health-Sparrow, 1215 Michigan Ave, Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0839-8896
Tim SchepersTrauma Unit, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. t.schepers@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1172-4939

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe most common early complication of operative treatment of ankle fractures is a surgical site infection (SSI) with an incidence rate varying between 1.5 and 16%, depending on various risk factors. A SSI has multiple disadvantages, including worse outcome and a socio-economic burden. The aim of this review is to provide an updated overview of the current concepts pertinent to SSI in ankle fractures.

methodsA descriptive literature review was performed to provide the overview.

resultsWell known risk factors for SSI are higher age, diabetes, open fractures and fracture dislocation. Diagnostic testing for infection include laboratory results (CRP, white blood cell count, leucocyte count), radiological imaging methods (conventional imaging, CT-scan, MRI-scan, 3-phase bone scan, FDG-PET) and microbiological deep tissue sampling. Treatment options for SSI are varied and include fracture reduction, antibiotic therapy with intravenous and oral treatment, surgical debridement and irrigation, transposition flaps in case of soft tissue defects with implant exposure and arthrodesis in severe infection with septic arthritis. Multiple studies show worse outcome scores in patients who develop a SSI. Prevention is important to reduce the rate of SSI. Surgery within 24 h decreases the risk of complications, compared to surgery performed in a delayed fashion. Appropriate timing and dosing of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis is necessary.

conclusionThis review described the most frequent risk factors, appropriate diagnostic testing methods, an oversight of treatment options, gives insight in the outcome and mentioned prevention measurements for SSI after ORIF in ankle fractures.

Indexed as

Ankle FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalSurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisDebridementHumansRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnkleFracture-related infectionOpen reduction internal fixationRisk factorsSurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID40156733
PMCPMC11954705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.