ArticleJournal of nephrology2025
Peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: twenty years of experience at a single center in a developing country.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to explore the role of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) in relation to metabolic and fluid control, outcome and risk factors for death.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study collecting data from a large reference Center in Brazil on patient characteristics, hospitalization, PD prescription and delivery, clinical outcomes and laboratory exams. We evaluated all patients who had been consecutively treated by PD between January 2004 and January 2024.
resultsFour hundred eighty-seven patients were included. Median age was 64.02 ± 15 years, most of the patients were hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) and needed vasoactive drugs and mechanical ventilation. Sepsis was the main cause of AKI followed by cardiorenal syndrome type 1. Uremia was the main indication for dialysis, followed by the need to meet metabolic and fluid demands. Blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels stabilized after a median of four dialysis sessions. Fluid removal increased progressively and stabilized at around 2.320 ± 0.91 ml after four sessions. Mechanical complications occurred in 9.2% and peritonitis in 6.2% of patients. Regarding AKI outcome, 34.9% recovered renal function, 6.8% remained on dialysis for over 30 days, and 55.8% died. Technique failure occurred in 19.9% of the cases and the main cause was a mechanical complication. Age, hepatorenal syndrome, APACHE score and dropout from PD due to insufficient fluid control were identified as risk factors for death, while cardiorenal syndrome, need to meet metabolic and fluid demand as indication of dialysis, and negative fluid balance after 4 sessions of PD were identified as protective factors.
conclusionPD may be an effective solution for AKI patients, allowing adequate metabolic and fluid control. Age, APACHE score, hepatorenal syndrome and dropout from PD were associated with death, while cardiorenal syndrome, need to meet metabolic and fluid demands as indication of dialysis, and negative fluid balance were positive prognostic factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40156699What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.