Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40156689›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025

Diagnostic performance of deep learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography in detecting coronary artery stenosis.

Yang Chen, Hong Yu, Bin Fan, Yong Wang, Zhibo Wen, Zhihui Hou, Jihong Yu, Haiping Wang, Zhe Tang, Ning Li and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06172985 (A CCTA Image Assisted Triage Software for the Assessment of Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06172985 unknown statusnot on this map

A CCTA Image Assisted Triage Software for the Assessment of Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: a Retrospective, Multi-center, Blind-evaluation Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKeya MedicalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled1,093ConditionsCoronary Heart DiseaseArmsNo intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yang ChenDepartment of Radiology, State Key Lab and National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, #167 Bei-Li-Shi Street, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100037, China.
Hong YuDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center of Guizhou Province, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China.
Bin FanDepartment of Radiology, Huanggang Central Hospital, Huanggang, Hubei, China.
Yong WangDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 89, Donggang Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Zhibo WenDepartment of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhihui HouDepartment of Radiology, State Key Lab and National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, #167 Bei-Li-Shi Street, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100037, China.
Jihong YuDepartment of Radiology, State Key Lab and National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, #167 Bei-Li-Shi Street, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100037, China.
Haiping WangDepartment of Radiology, State Key Lab and National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, #167 Bei-Li-Shi Street, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100037, China.
Zhe TangKeya Medical Technology Co., LTD., Beijing, China.
Ning LiKeya Medical Technology Co., LTD., Beijing, China.
Peng JiangKeya Medical Technology Co., LTD., Beijing, China.
Yang WangDepartment of Medical Research and Biometrics Center, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Weihua YinDepartment of Radiology, State Key Lab and National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, #167 Bei-Li-Shi Street, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100037, China. yinweihua415@126.com.
Bin LuDepartment of Radiology, State Key Lab and National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, #167 Bei-Li-Shi Street, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100037, China. blu@vip.sina.com.

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2023-I2M-C&T-B-065National Natural Science Foundation of China 82102036the Ministry of Science and Technology of China, National key research and development project 2016YFC1300403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo validate a fully automated, deep learning model based on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) with stenosis ≥ 50%, which is commonly used as a clinical threshold for further testing and management. This model aims to improve diagnostic efficiency by automating the identification of significant coronary stenosis(≥ 50%).

methodsThis multicenter clinical trial included patients been undergone CCTA from October 13, 2022, to February 28, 2023. CCTA data from suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) patients were retrospectively analyzed using deep learning-based software for comprehensive assessment, including coronary segmentation, lumen, and stenosis determination with comparison to the reference standard of consensus by three experts. This study utilized a multi-stage deep learning framework for coronary artery segmentation and stenosis analysis from CCTA images, consisting of several key components, including the 3D Multi-resolution Cascade Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), 3D Cascade-Locally Optimized Network, and Stenosis Analysis Network. The clinical trial registry number was NCT06172985.

resultsA total of 1090 patients (mean age: 59.90 ± 11.51 years, 47.3% female) were included in this multicenter study. Artificial intelligence (AI) demonstrated excellent performance at the patient level, accurately diagnosing ≥ 50% stenosis by assessing each patient's coronary artery condition. The AI system showed high values for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The values of the above statistics were 92.8%, 95.3%, 91.4%, 85.6%, and 97.3%, respectively. Excellent agreement was seen between expert readers and deep learning-determined maximal diameter stenosis for per-patient (kappa coefficients: 0.84, 95%CI: 0.81-0.88). Regarding diagnostic efficiency, comparing the AI with expert readers, the average reading time decreased from 5.94 min to 2.01 min (p < 0.001).

conclusionA novel AI-based assessment of CCTA can accurately and rapidly identify patients with coronary artery stenosis ≥ 50%, aiding in effective triage within the defined study population.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsDeep LearningRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexArtificial intelligenceCoronary artery diseaseCoronary computed tomography angiographyDeep learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.