ReviewCurrent urology reports2025
A Review of the Long-term Outcomes of Incontinent Diversion in the Pediatric Neurogenic Bladder.
Review in Current urology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Save the Bladder: Continent Urinary Diversion as Best Practice for Patients With Refractory Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2026Review
- Urinary Diversion with Left Sided Ileal Conduit for Neurogenic Bladder in a Patient with Sacral Agenesis and Situs Inversus: A Case Report.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis review offers an evaluation of the limited literature detailing the outcomes of incontinent urinary diversion in the pediatric neurogenic bladder patient. We will discuss the indications for incontinent urinary diversion, procedural options, surgical techniques, postoperative complications, and overall patient impact. RECENT
findingsIncontinent urinary diversions remain a valuable treatment option for patients with neurogenic bladder especially the highly selected patient with few other options. Irrespective of the diversion chosen, postoperative complications do arise, and long-term follow-up is imperative. Ensuring the longevity and effectiveness of the diversion is critical, especially in a pediatric patient cohort with multiple long term risks including obesity- a factor that can directly impact reconstructive function. The dearth of available data highlights the need for more longitudinal studies of pediatric patient cohorts to determine true impact and risk related to incontinent urinary diversion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.