SynthesisInflammopharmacology2025
Comparative efficacy of pharmacologic interventions in ulcerative colitis: a network meta analysis.
Synthesis in Inflammopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety and efficacy of IL-23 inhibitors in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Pooled it
- Optimal use and cycling strategies of Janus kinase inhibitors in ulcerative colitis: current evidence and clinical implications from the KASID Guidelines Task Force Team.Intestinal research · 2026Review
- Development and evaluation of a machine learning model to predict unplanned readmission risk in patients with ulcerative colitis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Emerging role of Janus kinase inhibitors in ulcerative colitis management.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUlcerative colitis is chronic inflammatory condition affecting the colon, necessitating remission inducing therapeutic interventions. With the emergence of newer more advanced options, their relative effectiveness remains unclear. This network meta-analysis (NMA) will compare the effectiveness of presently available biologics and small molecules in achieving and maintaining remission among patients of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis as part of induction and maintenance therapy.
methodsA systematic search was conducted up to 21st February 2025, including only phase 2b/3 or 3 randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was induction and maintenance of clinical remission (Full Mayo Score (FMS) ≤ 2, with no individual subscore > 1). Secondary outcomes assessed were clinical response, endoscopic improvement (Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES) ≤ 1 either with or without friability) and steroid free remission.
resultsAcross 22 studies (7,683 patients), upadacitinib had the highest likelihood of inducing clinical remission (99.08%), clinical response (97.44%) and endoscopic improvement (99.32%), followed by Infliximab and guselkumab following close by for specific outcomes. In maintenance of clinical remission and endoscopic improvement upadacitinib again ranked highest (95.60%) and (99.46%). Tofacitinib (92.43%) has the highest probability with upadacitinib (87.73%) following behind in achieving steroid free remission.
conclusionUpadacitinib displayed high efficacy across multiple outcomes in both induction and maintenance therapy with Infliximab, guselkumab, and filgotinib following closely behind. For achieving steroid free remission tofacitinib has the highest probability of doing so. Overall small molecules and selective IL-23 inhibitors seems promising alternative to older biologics though additional head-to-head trial are warranted along with more real-world data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.