SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2025
Comparison of the quality of life and biochemical characteristics of patients undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on: comparison of the quality of life and biochemical characteristics of patients undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Surgical risk factors for technical survival of peritoneal dialysis catheters.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnd-stage kidney failure (ESKF) requires kidney replacement therapy (KRT), which has a significant effect on the quality of life (QoL) of patients. Globally, well-established treatment options for ESKF include HD, PD, and kidney transplantation. Each has a unique effect on a patient's QoL in terms of their physical, mental, and social health. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the QoL of patients undergoing PD and HD by utilizing the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), EuroQoL-5-dimension (EQ-5D), and WHOQOL-BREF questionnaires.
methodsWe performed a comprehensive review and meta-analysis by identifying relevant research through the use of ScienceDirect, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar. These studies examined patients with ESKF who were undergoing either HD or PD and reported changes in QoL and biochemical characteristics. If heterogeneity was present, we calculated and pooled the standardized mean differences (SMDs) in QoL among modalities via a random effects model.
resultsThis analysis included twenty-five (25) studies that examined the QoL and biochemical characteristics of a total of 5,440 participants. Among these participants, 3465 (63.75%) were receiving HD, and 1975 (36.25%) were receiving PD. The QoL instruments assess a variety of effects. However, these studies demonstrate that PD consistently performs better than HD in multiple assessment components, including for burdens of kidney disease, general health, mental health, and emotional. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in the QoL scores regarding cognitive ability, energy levels, physical health, patient satisfaction, psychology, social interaction, emotional well-being, sexual functioning, or sleeping patterns between these modalities.
conclusionThe study's findings show that patients with PD have a higher QoL in comparison to those with HD. Despite reports of enhanced QoL among PD patients, their global prevalence remains relatively low. Therefore, healthcare professionals should prioritize the development and implementation of strategies for ESKF patients, considering PD as the primary treatment. The results suggest a trend favoring PD over HD in various aspects of QOL. However, the significant heterogeneity and the lower number of PD patients require careful interpretation of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40156644What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.