ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2025
Efficacy and safety of combined anti-vascular and two-staged stereotactic radiosurgery therapy for brain metastases with brainstem compression: a retrospective multicenter study.
Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery poses a significant risk when treating brain metastases in close proximity to the brainstem. To address this issue, a novel approach known as "combined anti-vascular therapy" has been devised for these metastases. This treatment regimen involves a one-week course of two-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (2-SSRS), supplemented with the administration of the anti-vascular agent bevacizumab during the radiosurgery interval. We tried to find out the effectiveness and safety of 2-SSRS plus bevacizumab therapy for brain metastases that compress the brainstem, and prognostic factors that related to the tumor local control. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated at five gamma knife treatment centers to assess changes in tumor size and peritumoral edema volume. Cox regression model was used to find out prognostic factors for tumor local control. Clinical symptom changes were evaluated using the Headache Scale (VAS), Dizziness Disorder Inventory (DHI), Vomiting Scale (VS), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). The Karnofsky Task Scale (KPS) and Barthel Index (BI) were used to assess overall physical fitness and physical activity rehabilitation. Tumor local control (TLC) and overall survival (OS) rate were also calculated for the patients. Among the 36 patients with brain metastases with brainstem compression, 36 received combined anti-vascular therapy. Both edema volume and tumor volume significantly decreased during the treatment period and post-treatment 3 months (p < 0.01). Clinical symptoms, as indicated by median scores of VAS, DHI, VS, and GCS, showed significant improvement during treatment and at the 3-month follow-up (p < 0.01). Median changes in KPS and BI, reflecting overall physical fitness and physical activity rehabilitation, were also similar and statistically significant (p < 0.01). The patient cohort exhibited a median overall survival of 14.2 months, with corresponding 6-month and 12-month survival rates of 91.7% and 80.0%, respectively. Tumor local control rates at 6 and 12 months were 94.7% and 78.9%, Patient with KPS score > = 60 and single intracranial brain metastasis before treatment enjoy longer local tumor control. The combination of anti-vascular therapy with 2-SSRS demonstrates safety and efficacy in treating patients with brain metastases with brainstem compression. This approach rapidly alleviates patient symptoms, effectively manages tumor progression, extends overall survival, and exhibits manageable adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40156632What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.