ArticleSurgery today2025
Clinical relevance of the red blood cell distribution width measured preoperatively as a prognostic marker in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Article in Surgery today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe clinical relevance of the red blood cell distribution width (RDW) in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has not been clearly investigated.
methodsThe relationship between the preoperatively measured RDW and prognosis for the recurrence/survival was evaluated in patients with DCC undergoing PD. A subgroup analysis was also performed in patients with pathological stage I DCC.
resultsA total of 77 patients were included in the analysis. The cutoff value of the preoperatively measured RDW was set at 14%, and the normal reference range at our center was ≤ 14%. The patient group with an RDW > 14% (n = 30) had a significantly lower mean serum albumin level, higher mean serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level, and a higher proportion of cases with pathological lymphatic invasion and showed a significantly worse overall survival than the patient group with an RDW ≤ 14% (n = 47). Similar findings were noted in both the overall study population and patients with pathological stage I disease. Multivariate analysis identified an RDW > 14% and pathological lymph node metastasis as independent risk factors for a poor postoperative survival.
conclusionThe preoperatively measured RDW is a promising prognostic predictor in patients with DCC undergoing PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40156628What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.