Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40156611›Full record

ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025

Models to evaluate the pulmonary toxicity of desert dust and what we have learned from them so far: a mini-review.

Gerrit Bredeck, Roel P F Schins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gerrit BredeckIUF - Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3268-0752
Roel P F SchinsIUF - Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine, Düsseldorf, Germany. roel.schins@iuf-duesseldorf.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5881-6289

Funding

Leibniz-Gemeinschaft K225/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millions of people worldwide are exposed to aerosolised desert dust and are at risk of the adverse respiratory health effects it causes. This mini-review gives an overview of the study types that can be used to assess the respiratory toxicity of desert dust and the insights gained from these studies. We highlight the main advantages and disadvantages of epidemiological, in vivo, and in vitro studies. Regarding in vitro studies, we discuss models of increasing complexity, i.e., traditional submerged cell cultures, air-liquid interface cultures, organ-on-a-chip models, organoids, and precision-cut lung slices. Epidemiological studies have shown increased short-term mortality and exacerbated acute and chronic respiratory diseases after desert dust events. In contrast, a connection to the onset of chronic diseases is more difficult to prove. In vivo and in vitro studies have particularly addressed the cellular and molecular effects of desert dust. It was found that desert dust activates immune cells and induces the expression of inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress markers. The specific effects and their extent vary between dust samples from different sources. The investigation of the role of the composition is still immature and needs further effort including more extensive screenings. The advancement of easy-to-handle and realistic pulmonary in vitro models is required to automate screenings, support mechanistic insights, and enable the assessment of long-term exposure scenarios. In agreement with striving to develop new approach methodologies, such advancements can reduce and replace animal experiments and strongly benefit the translatability of research outcomes to human health protection.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsDesert ClimateDustLungModels, BiologicalAnimalsHumansAir PollutantsDustInflammationIn vitro modelLung toxicityMineral dust

Identifiers

PMID40156611
PMCPMC12449402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.