Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40156493›Full record

ArticleThe clinical teacher2025

Community-Powered Learning: A Qualitative Analysis of Postgraduate Medical Trainee Development Through Journal Club.

Anne L Murray, Brian H Walsh, Anél Wiese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The clinical teacher, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne L MurrayDepartment of Neonatology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3548-3969
Brian H WalshDepartment of Neonatology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Anél WieseMedical Education Unit, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJournal clubs are a core feature of postgraduate medical education. They are used to teach critical appraisal skills and evidence-based medicine to postgraduate trainees. Studies have been carried out examining the purpose and goals of journal club, but with minimal input from learners. Thus, the research question was devised, 'why do postgraduate trainees find journal clubs effective for their continuous professional development and what underlying processes facilitate their learning and engagement in these settings?'

methodsA qualitative study was designed to capture the opinions of the learners when considering learning through journal club. Semi-structured interviews were felt to be most appropriate to allow participants to explore freely how they learn from journal club as well as the aspects of the club that support or hinder learning. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

results21 interviews were conducted within two departments in adjoining hospitals. There were 6 consultants, 9 registrars and 6 SHOs interviewed. The median (IQR) interview time was 23.5 (19.5-27.3) minutes. The themes identified were committed participation, with subthemes of habit formation and positive environment, and transformative participation, with subthemes of emerging leaders and shared experience. DISCUSSION/

conclusionThe themes identified from our interviews align with principles of communities of practice and legitimate peripheral participation. Regular meetings in a positive learning environment are vital. Mutual engagement and role modelling contribute hugely to trainee learning from journal club, through the development of relationships between junior and senior members in the preparation, delivery and discussion of literature.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateLearningPeriodicals as TopicHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative Researchcontinuous professional developmentinterviewjournal clubpostgraduatequalitativetrainee

Identifiers

PMID40156493
PMCPMC11954155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.