ArticleThoracic cancer2025
Survival and Perioperative Outcomes After Addition of Immunotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy (NCRI) for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is attracting attention. The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes and survival between patients receiving NCRI and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by surgery.
methodsThis study retrospectively included patients with locally advanced ESCC and treated with NCRI or NCRT followed by esophagectomy. Two groups were compared for pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, R0 resection rate, and 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). Surgery time, the number of lymph nodes removed, postoperative complications, and 30-day mortality were also compared. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize the potential impact of confounding factors.
resultsAfter PSM, patients in the NCRI group showed a significantly higher pCR rate compared with those in the NCRT group (54.2% vs. 27.1%, p = 0.046). R0 resection rate (100% vs. 89.6%, p = 0.251), surgery time (p = 0.614), the number of lymph nodes removed (p = 0.526), the incidence of total postoperative complications (46.4% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.564) and 30-day mortality (3.6% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.983) were comparable between the two groups. The NCRI group exhibited a significantly higher 3-year RFS rate compared to the NCRT group (79.2% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.032).
conclusionFor patients with locally advanced ESCC, NCRI showed a significantly higher pCR rate than conventional NCRT, without increased operative risk. NCRI followed by surgery exhibited a superior RFS compared to NCRT followed by surgery. Prospective studies are needed in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.