Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40156433›Full record

ArticleJournal of microscopy2025

Quantifying phase magnitudes of open-source focused-probe 4D-STEM ptychography reconstructions.

Toma Susi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Toma SusiFaculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2513-573X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate computational ptychographic phase reconstructions are enabled by fast direct-electron cameras with high dynamic ranges used for four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D-STEM). The availability of open software packages is making such analyses widely accessible, and especially when implemented in Python, easy to compare in terms of computational efficiency and reconstruction quality. In this contribution, I reconstruct atomic phase shifts from convergent-beam electron diffraction maps of pristine monolayer graphene, which is an ideal dose-robust uniform phase object, acquired on a Dectris ARINA detector installed in a Nion UltraSTEM 100 operated at 60 keV with a focused-probe convergence semi-angle of 34 mrad. For two different recorded maximum scattering angle settings, I compare a range of direct and iterative open-source phase reconstruction algorithms, evaluating their computational efficiency and tolerance to reciprocal-space binning and real-space thinning of the data. The quality of the phase images is assessed by quantifying the variation of atomic phase shifts using a robust parameter-based method, revealing an overall agreement with some notable differences in the absolute magnitudes and the variation of the phases. Although such variation is not a major issue when analysing data with many identical atoms, it does put limits on what level of precision can be relied upon for unique sites such as defects or dopants, which also tend to be more dose-sensitive. Overall, these findings and the accompanying open data and code provide useful guidance for the sampling required for desired levels of phase precision, and suggest particular care is required when relying on electron ptychography for quantitative analyses of atomic-scale electromagnetic properties.

Indexed as

4D‐STEMelectron ptychographyfocused‐probegrapheneopen‐sourcephase quantification

Identifiers

PMID40156433
PMCPMC12523995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.