ArticleJournal of microscopy2025
Quantifying phase magnitudes of open-source focused-probe 4D-STEM ptychography reconstructions.
Article in Journal of microscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Origin of circular and triangular pores in electron-irradiated hexagonal boron nitride.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Quantifying phase magnitudes of open-source focused-probe 4D-STEM ptychography reconstructions.Journal of microscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate computational ptychographic phase reconstructions are enabled by fast direct-electron cameras with high dynamic ranges used for four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D-STEM). The availability of open software packages is making such analyses widely accessible, and especially when implemented in Python, easy to compare in terms of computational efficiency and reconstruction quality. In this contribution, I reconstruct atomic phase shifts from convergent-beam electron diffraction maps of pristine monolayer graphene, which is an ideal dose-robust uniform phase object, acquired on a Dectris ARINA detector installed in a Nion UltraSTEM 100 operated at 60 keV with a focused-probe convergence semi-angle of 34 mrad. For two different recorded maximum scattering angle settings, I compare a range of direct and iterative open-source phase reconstruction algorithms, evaluating their computational efficiency and tolerance to reciprocal-space binning and real-space thinning of the data. The quality of the phase images is assessed by quantifying the variation of atomic phase shifts using a robust parameter-based method, revealing an overall agreement with some notable differences in the absolute magnitudes and the variation of the phases. Although such variation is not a major issue when analysing data with many identical atoms, it does put limits on what level of precision can be relied upon for unique sites such as defects or dopants, which also tend to be more dose-sensitive. Overall, these findings and the accompanying open data and code provide useful guidance for the sampling required for desired levels of phase precision, and suggest particular care is required when relying on electron ptychography for quantitative analyses of atomic-scale electromagnetic properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.