Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40156414›Full record

Trial reportAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2025

Comparison Between Breath-Hold and the Inspiratory Phase of Free Breathing in Left Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: Target Volume Coverage and Organ Sparing.

Sarah Hazem Hussein, Loay Kassem, Mohamed Ibrahem Adrosy, Hussein Metwally

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah Hazem HusseinFayoum University, Faculty of Medicine, Egypt.
Loay KassemCairo University, Faculty of Medicine, Egypt.
Mohamed Ibrahem AdrosyAzhar University, Faculty of Science, Egypt.
Hussein MetwallyFayoum University, Faculty of Medicine, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac mortality and coronary events associated with left breast radiotherapy are correlated with the mean radiation dose to the heart.

methodsThis prospective phase II study included left breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant locoregional radiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) following surgery. Patients were treated using the respiratory gating (RPM) technique (Varian Medical Systems, USA). Dosimetric outcomes were compared between deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and the inspiratory phase of free breathing (FB) in the same patients, focusing on target volume coverage and sparing of critical organs (lungs, heart, and coronary arteries). The prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions over five weeks to the chest wall or breast and/or lymph nodes, with an additional boost of 10 Gy in five fractions over one week to the tumor bed in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) cases. Two treatment plans were generated per patient: one for DIBH and another for the inspiratory phase of FB.

resultsBetween February 2020 and August 2022, 60 patients with a mean age of 50 years were enrolled in the study. The dosimetric analysis showed that the mean heart dose was lower in the DIBH group (4.8 Gy) compared to the FB group (6.4 Gy) with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001). Similarly, the mean dose to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was significantly reduced in DIBH (14 Gy) compared to FB (20.5 Gy) (p < 0.0001). Regarding target volume coverage, the mean planning target volume (PTV) V95% was slightly higher in DIBH (97.3%) than in FB (96.5%) (p = 0.0062). The mean left lung V20 was comparable between the two techniques, with values of 14.4% in DIBH and 14.35% in FB (p = 0.85), indicating no significant difference in lung dose sparing. However, the mean left ventricular dose was significantly lower in DIBH (6 Gy) compared to FB (8.1 Gy) (p < 0.0001), further supporting the advantage of DIBH in reducing cardiac radiation exposure.

conclusionDIBH plans demonstrated superior target coverage and significantly improved cardiac and coronary sparing compared to FB inspiratory phase plans. However, FB plans remained within acceptable dose constraints. No significant differences were observed in lung dose sparing or beam-on time.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBreath HoldingOrgans at RiskOrgan Sparing TreatmentsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedUnilateral Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeartHumansInhalationMiddle AgedPrognosisFB inspiratory phaseleft breastpatients not able to do DIBHRPM

Identifiers

PMID40156414
PMCPMC12174524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.