ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2025
Counselling to Screening: Honing an Institutional Cervical Cancer Screening Program.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCervical cancer screening is an important tool in WHO's global strategy for cervical cancer elimination. The objective of the study was to suggest and study the impact of capacity building interventions to increase cervical cancer screening rates in women aged 30-49 years attending the gynecological OPD.
methodsAs part of a multicentric study, qualitative research was carried out at a tertiary care institute (from September 2021 to June 2022) to gather information regarding the existing cervical cancer screening practices, analyze factors preventing universal screening, and develop troubleshooting strategies. A fishbone analysis was done to identify barriers to cervical cancer screening. Stepwise sequential implementation of seven Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles which included; doctors training, policy formation, dedicated counsellor and reminders on social network groups, OPD card stamps, reading and educational material, screening in all OPD rooms and finally establishment of dedicated screening room. The effect of each on counselling and screening of eligible women was noted.
resultsWith the implementation of these PDSA cycles, the rates of eligible women being screened increased from 10.6% at baseline to 44.8% at the end of the study period. The percentage of counselled women increased to 70% and it was observed that counselled women were more likely to get screened.
conclusionEducating women about the importance of cervical cancer screening and the creation of a dedicated screening room were the two most important quality improvement interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.