ArticleMedical physics2025
A segment anything model-guided and match-based semi-supervised segmentation framework for medical imaging.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Spinal Cord and Canal Segmentation in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy : The Role of Interactive Learning Models with manual Click.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Depthwise-Dilated Convolutional Adapters for Medical Object Tracking and Segmentation Using the Segment Anything Model 2.Machine learning: science and technology · 2025Article
- Geometric, dosimetric and psychometric evaluation of three commercial AI software solutions for OAR auto-segmentation in head and neck radiotherapy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A segment anything model-guided and match-based semi-supervised segmentation framework for medical imaging.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSemi-supervised segmentation leverages sparse annotation information to learn rich representations from combined labeled and label-less data for segmentation tasks. The Match-based framework, by using the consistency constraint of segmentation results from different models/augmented label-less inputs, is found effective in semi-supervised learning. This approach, however, is challenged by the low quality of pseudo-labels generated as intermediate products for training the network, due to the lack of the ''ground-truth'' reference. PURPOSE: This study aims to leverage the foundation model, segment anything model (SAM), to assist unsupervised learning of Match-based frameworks. Trained with an extremely large dataset, SAM-based methods generalize better than traditional models to various imaging domains, allow it to serve as an assistant to Match-based frameworks to improve the quality of intermediate pseudo-labels for semi-supervised learning.
methodsWe propose SAM-Match, a SAM-guided and Match-based framework for semi-supervised medical image segmentation. Our approach involves two main steps: First, we use pretrained Match-based models to extract high-confidence predictions for prompt generation. Second, these prompts and unlabeled images are input into a fine-tuned SAM-based method to produce high-quality masks as pseudo-labels. And the refined pseudo-labels are further fed back to train the Match-based framework. SAM-Match can be trained in an end-to-end manner, facilitating interactions between the SAM- and Match-based models.
resultsSAM-Match demonstrates robust performance across multiple medical imaging datasets, including the ACDC cardiac MRI dataset, the BUSI breast ultrasound dataset, and an in-house liver MRI dataset (MRLiver). We partitioned the datasets into training, validation, and test sets (70%, 10%, and 20% for ACDC; 60%, 9%, and 31% for BUSI; and 62%, 12%, and 25% for MRLiver). On ACDC, with only 3 labeled cases, we achieved a Dice score of 89.36% ± 0.06% on 20 test cases. For BUSI, using just 30 labeled samples for training, we attained a Dice score of 59.35% ± 0.12% on 170 test samples. On MRLiver, training with only 3 labeled cases resulted in a Dice score of 80.04% ± 0.11% on 12 test scans. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni corrections between the SAM-Match framework and the other comparison methods further demonstrated the statistical significance of SAM-Match's improvement in segmentation accuracy.
conclusionsOur SAM-Match framework shows promising results in semi-supervised semantic segmentation, effectively tackling the challenges of automatic prompt generation for SAM and high-quality pseudo-label generation for Match-based models. It can help accelerate the adoption of semi-supervised learning in segmentation tasks, particularly in data-scarce scenarios. Our data and code will be made available at https://github.com/apple1986/SAMatch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.