Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40156364›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2025

Current Landscape of Urological Surgical Training: A Needs Assessment Survey in Japan.

Noriyuki Abe, Takashige Abe, Kanta Hori, Junya Abe, Kazufumi Okada, Keita Takahashi, Shigeru Harada, Masafumi Kon, Jun Furumido, Kohei Hashimoto and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Editorial Comment to Current Landscape of Urological Surgical Training: A Needs Assessment Survey in Japan.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Noriyuki AbeDepartment of Renal and Urologic Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University School of Medicine, Asahikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3306-9544
Takashige AbeDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5468-7632
Kanta HoriDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5875-6738
Junya AbeDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7486-1831
Kazufumi OkadaData Science Center, Promotion Unit, Institute of Health Science Innovation for Medical Care, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Keita TakahashiData Science Center, Promotion Unit, Institute of Health Science Innovation for Medical Care, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Shigeru HaradaDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Masafumi KonDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Jun FurumidoDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4526-6529
Kohei HashimotoDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0873-4642
Sachiyo MuraiDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroshi KikuchiDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4999-8994
Naoya MasumoriDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Hidehiro KakizakiDepartment of Renal and Urologic Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University School of Medicine, Asahikawa, Japan.
Nobuo ShinoharaDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo clarify the present state and issues to be resolved in urological surgical training in Japan.

methodsA web-based needs assessment survey was conducted, inviting urologists belonging to three university hospitals and 34 affiliated hospitals in Hokkaido, Japan. Physicians with less than 15 years of experience were defined as trainees, and those with more than 15 years were defined as instructors. The survey investigated the current surgical education, training environments, and issues to be resolved.

resultsThe response rate was 98.2% (169/172). Overall, the current surgical training in our cohort largely depended on "on-the-job" training. Regarding the effectiveness of surgical education materials, teaching in the operating room during procedures gained the highest scores for both trainees and instructors, followed by review of operative movies. Regarding the dedicated time for studying/training/teaching apart from routine clinical duties, 87.1% (74/85) of trainees and 96.4% (81/84) of instructors did not have any time. A total of 58.8% (50/85) of trainees considered open surgery to be undertrained, while only 8.3% (7/84) of instructors considered that open surgery was difficult to teach in their hospitals. Among instructors, 54.8% (46/84) acknowledged limitations regarding the current training program.

conclusionsThe current surgical training in urology in Hokkaido, Japan, largely depends on "on-the-job" training methods. About two-thirds of trainees consider open surgery to be undertrained. Our observations could be utilized to update the training curriculum in Japan.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateNeeds AssessmentUrologic Surgical ProceduresUrologyClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansJapanMaleSurveys and Questionnairescurriculumneeds assessment surveysurgical educationsurgical residency trainingurology

Identifiers

PMID40156364
PMCPMC12230909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.