ArticleTrauma, violence & abuse2026
Strengths-Based Programs for Youth at Risk for Toxic Stress: A Scoping Review of Programs Targeting Mental Health, Substance Use, Parenting Skills, and Family Functioning.
Article in Trauma, violence & abuse, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This scoping review explores and describes recent strengths-based programs for use among youth (ages 12-24) at risk for toxic stress that target mental health (MH) or substance use (SU) outcomes through improving family functioning (FF) and/or parenting skills (PS). Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, seven databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between 2018 and 2023. Inclusion criteria included articles describing programs delivered to both youth and caregivers that targeted MH or SU outcomes through improving FF and/or PS. Thirty-three articles describing 33 programs were identified, 25 of which were research studies. Programs predominantly employed behavioral frameworks with varied duration and caregiver involvement. Most targeted MH outcomes, with fewer addressing SU. Positive outcomes included reductions in youth depression and anxiety, and improvements in emotional regulation and FF. Gaps identified included a majority of studies conducted in high-income countries, a prevalence of non-experimental designs, and a lack of standardized outcome measures. Results highlight the potential of family-centered, relational health-based interventions in promoting youth resilience and identify a need for more rigorous evaluations, culturally-responsive interventions, and increased research in low- and middle-income countries. This review underscores the promise of these interventions while revealing significant areas for future research to enhance effectiveness and applicability among adversity-impacted youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.