Trial reportTrends in hearing
Closedness of Acoustic Coupling and Audiological Measures Are Associated with Individual Speech-in-Noise Benefit From Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids.
Trial report in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Digital Noise Reduction Processing on Subjective and Objective (Pupillometry) Assays of Listening Effort.Audiology research · 2025Article
- Advantages of Fluctuating Noise for Measuring Speech Intelligibility in Listeners With Hearing Loss.Trends in hearingArticle
- Noise Management Preferences During Long-Term Hearing Aid Usage and Their Relation to Audiologic Factors.Trends in hearingArticle
- Influence of Noise Reduction on Ocular Markers of Listening Effort in Hearing Aid Users in Darkness and Ambient Light.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The combination of directional microphones (DIR) and spectral noise reduction (NR) is a common technique in hearing aid signal processing, for improving speech intelligibility in spatial acoustic scenarios. The benefit from DIR + NR varies considerably across individuals, which impedes prescribing the optimal strength of such processing during hearing aid fitting. The goal of this study was to investigate the correlation of four audiological factors with the benefit of speech reception thresholds (SRTs) from DIR + NR: the closedness of the acoustic coupling in the ear canal, audible contrast thresholds test (ACT™), the audiogram, and age. As part of a larger field study, 123 experienced hearing aid users in two centers in Germany and Japan were fitted bilaterally with the same hearing aids. SRTs were obtained with and without strong DIR + NR in a spatial speech-in-noise scenario before and after the field trials. Closedness of acoustic coupling was found to have the strongest correlation with SRT benefit from DIR + NR (most likely dominated by DIR rather than NR processing), followed by audible contrast thresholds (ACT) and the audiogram, both with the same significantly weaker correlation. Age was not correlated with the benefit from DIR + NR. The results suggest fitting hearing aid users irrespective of age with as-closed-as-possible acoustic coupling to maximize the benefit of DIR + NR. Furthermore, the closedness of acoustic coupling in combination with ACT or the audiogram may serve audiologists in predicting individual speech intelligibility benefits from strong DIR + NR for better guidance to set its strength during hearing aid fitting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.