Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40156213›Full record

ArticleJournal of water and health2025

Evaluation of drinking water quality test kits for home use in the United States.

LeighAnn D'Andrea, Emily Kumpel

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of water and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

LeighAnn D'AndreaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 130 Natural Resources Road, Amherst, MA 01003, USA; United States Air Force, 3465 North Carolina Ave, Upper Marlboro, MD 20762, USA.
Emily KumpelDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 130 Natural Resources Road, Amherst, MA 01003, USA E-mail: ekumpel@umass.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0138-8441

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water consumers in the United States may want to test their drinking water using at-home commercially available test kits rather than a certified laboratory due to convenience and affordability. However, while numerous do-it-yourself test kits are available for purchase online or at local stores, these kits are unregulated and lack data on their performance. We evaluated off-the-shelf home drinking water test kits that measure iron, copper, manganese, and fluoride concentrations to investigate whether these kits could reliably provide meaningful results. We evaluated their performance in three water matrices: deionized water (DI), tap water, and river water, and with laboratory-trained personnel compared to untrained users. Our results showed highly repeatable but variable performance in the test kits' ability to detect potential contaminants in the water. Most kits performed best in the DI water matrix with no interference. Our results suggest that there are concerns about their accuracy and usefulness and that whether the results can be relied on depends on which parameter is being measured in which water with which kit and for which purpose.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalFluoridesMetals, HeavyReproducibility of ResultsUnited StatesWater QualityWater SupplyDrinking WaterFluoridesMetals, HeavyWater Pollutants, Chemicalcitizen sciencedrinking waterfield testing methodswater quality testing

Identifiers

PMID40156213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.