Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40156199›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Chinese residents: A national cross-sectional survey in the community setting.

Tianshuo Zhao, Xianming Cai, Sihui Zhang, Mingting Wang, Linyi Chen, Xikun Li, Zhuangye Wang, Li Wang, Wenguo Jiang, Yu Ha and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tianshuo ZhaoDepartment of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Xianming CaiDepartment of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Sihui ZhangDepartment of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Mingting WangDepartment of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Linyi ChenDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Xikun LiThe First Psychiatric Hospital of Harbin, Harbin, Heilongjiang, P. R. China.
Zhuangye WangDezhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Dezhou, Shandong, P. R. China.
Li WangSuzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Suzhou, Anhui, P. R. China.
Wenguo JiangJining Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jining, Shandong, P. R. China.
Yu HaJiuzhaigou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Aba, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Hui LiGansu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Laznhou, Gansu, P. R. China.
Yaqiong LiuDepartment of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Qingbin LuDepartment of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Fuqiang CuiDepartment of Laboratorial Science and Technology & Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine hesitancy is associated with community aggregation, inducing low vaccine coverage and potentially more frequent community-level outbreak. Addressing vaccine hesitancy in community settings should be a priority for healthcare providers. A cross-sectional online questionnaire survey was conducted during June and July 2022. Ten sites were set up in eastern, central, and western China, from where residents were recruited in a community setting. In total, 7,241 residents from 71 communities were included. Of the residents, 7.0% had refusal administration, 30.4% had delayed administration, and community clustering accounted for 2.4-3.7% and 8.5-9.6% of the variation, respectively. The reasons for primary-dose refusal were diseases, pregnancy, or lactation, whereas the main reasons for booster-dose refusal were diseases during the vaccination period, no time to vaccinate, and felt unnecessary to vaccinate. Younger age (under 40), female, residing in urban settings and having self-reported diseases were sociodemographic indicators of risk for refusal. In the health belief model of refusing to vaccinate, perceived barriers had a positive impact on refusal (β = 0.08), while perceived benefits had a negative impact (β = -0.09). In conclusion, this study underscores the population heterogeneity and community clustering of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy. Targeted interventions for these high-risk groups are crucial to enhance vaccination coverage and prevent outbreaks. Public health strategies should address vaccine hesitancy at different stages and doses, while considering both individual beliefs and community dynamics.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesVaccination HesitancyVaccination RefusalAdolescentAdultAgedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEast Asian PeopleFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinescommunityCOVID-19 vaccinecross-sectional studyVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID40156199
PMCPMC11959896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.