ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2025
An analytical screening platform to differentiate acute and prolonged exposures of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances on invasive cellular phenotypes.
Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are "forever chemicals" and pervasive environmental contaminants associated with cancer. Epidemiological studies found that an increased incidence of hormone-sensitive breast cancer is correlated with PFAS exposure. Cell-based assays provide a well-controlled experimental platform to quantify cellular responses as a function of exposure. Given the nearly 15,000 known PFAS on the Environmental Protection Agency's toxicity database (DSSTox), in vitro models are the only feasible approach to screen this large molecular library. One of the hallmarks of cancer is increased migration and invasion, processes that are the gateway to metastasis. Using a paper-based invasion assay developed in our lab, we compared the invasion of the MCF7 and M231 cell lines after acute and prolonged exposures to 2 legacy PFAS compounds, individually and in an equimolar mixture: perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS). The acute exposures quantified cellular movement after a 24-h period in the presence of the molecule of interest. The prolonged exposures in this work exposed 5 consecutive cell passages to the PFAS. We hypothesized that prolonged PFAS exposures would select for invasive subpopulations. These prolonged exposures increased the invasion of MCF7 and M231 cells compared to acute exposures of the same PFAS concentration (10 µM). The prolonged exposures to PFOA and PFOS at environmentally relevant concentrations (10 nM) did not increase invasion. Our results highlight the need to assess different exposure durations in vitro and that the paper-based invasion assay is a reasonable screening tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.