ReviewEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2025
Posterior left pericardiotomy: what is the advantage in cardiac surgery?
Review in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPostoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common complication following cardiac surgery and is associated with prolonged in-hospital stay and increased costs, morbidity (including stroke and heart failure) and mortality. Posterior pericardiotomy (PP) is a surgical intervention aimed at draining the pericardium into the left pleural cavity to reduce POAF occurrence. This review summarizes the current evidence on the use of PP and highlights future perspectives for clinical research.
methodsThe present work is a narrative review, a systematic literature search was therefore not performed. After collegial discussion, the most relevant papers as per the authors' opinion were selected and formed the basis of the present review.
resultsSeveral studies support the hypothesis that PP decreases the incidence of POAF, pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade after cardiac surgery. Although an increased incidence of pleural effusion has been reported after PP, this finding does not translate into increased pulmonary complications. Whether the systematic use of PP during cardiac surgery improves long-term outcomes is unclear.
conclusionsPP is a simple and safe technique that holds the potential to positively impact cardiac surgical patients' postoperative course. The results of upcoming, multicentre trials will help shed definitive light on this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.