Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40156108›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2025

How soon should we remove a chest drain following anatomic lung resection?

Ashiq Abdul Khader, Eric Lim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ashiq Abdul KhaderDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Part of Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9101-1324
Eric LimDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Part of Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9078-3226

Funding

AstraZenecaBoehringer IngelheimImperial InnovationsMedela
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesChest drain duration has a key influence on recovery post-thoracic surgery. There is no universally accepted protocol determining the timing of chest drain removal. We aim to review and discuss the factors that determine how soon chest drains can be removed following anatomic lung resection.

methodsFluid output and air leak are the main determinants of chest drain removal. We reviewed the literature to determine which cut offs have been proposed and the use of protocol for decision-making in chest drain removal.

resultsUse of air leak alone as the determinant for chest drain removal optimizes chest drain management, and studies that have utilized this protocol can achieve drain removal on the 1st postoperative day in most cases. Moving forward, surgery without routine chest drains can help move towards day case thoracic surgery, even for anatomic lung resection.

conclusionsUtilizing digital drainage with a strict air leak protocol helps to minimize drain duration post lung resection. The future landscape of chest drain management should focus on the usage of chest drains on an as required basis for air leak, even for anatomic lung resection.

Indexed as

Chest TubesDevice RemovalDrainagePneumonectomyHumansTime FactorsChest drainDrain protocolDrain removalLung resectionThoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID40156108
PMCPMC11953031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.