Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40156074›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2025

Getting ON-TRAC, a team-centred design study of a reflexivity aid to support resuscitation teams' information sharing.

Lars Mommers, Dennie Wulterkens, Steven Winkel, Bas van den Bogaard, Walter J Eppich, Walther N K A van Mook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lars MommersDepartment of Simulation in Healthcare, MUMC, Maastricht, the Netherlands. l.mommers@mumc.nl.
Dennie WulterkensMedical Quality Training Institute, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Steven WinkelDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bas van den BogaardDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Walter J EppichFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Walther N K A van MookSchool of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective information sharing is crucial for emergency care teams to maintain an accurate shared mental model. This study describes the design, simulation-based testing and implementation of a team reflexivity aid to facilitate in-action information sharing during resuscitations.

methodsA five-phase team-centred iterative design process was employed. Phase 1 involved a literature review to identify in-action cognitive aids. Phase 2 focused on conceptual design, followed by simulation-based testing and modifications in phase 3. Implementation through simulation-based user training occurred in phase 4 at a large non-university teaching hospital. Phase 5 evaluated the aid among resuscitation team members in the emergency department after one year.

resultsThe phase 1 literature review identified 58 cognitive aids, with only 10 designed as 'team aid'. Studies using team information screens found increase team and task performance in simulation-based environments, with no evaluations in authentic workplaces. Phase 2 resulted in a three-section team reflexivity aid, iteratively modified in three rounds of simulation-based testing (N = 30 groups) phase 3 resulted in a team reflexivity aid containing five sections: resuscitation times and intervals, patient history, interventions on a longitudinal timeline, differential diagnosis and a quick review section. Phase 4 consisted of reflexivity aid user training with simulation-based education (N = 60 sessions) and the creation of a digital entry form to store data in the patient's electronic medical record. Evaluation after one year in phase 5, (N = 84) showed perceived improvements in communication (3.82 ± 0.77), documentation (4.25 ± 0.66), cognitive load (3.94 ± 0.68), and team performance (3.80 ± 0.76) on a 5-point Likert scale. Thematic analysis of user feedback identified improvements in both teamwork and taskwork. Teamwork enhancements included better situation awareness, communication and team participation. Taskwork improvements were seen in drug administration and clinical reasoning.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated the successful development and implementation of a Team Reflexivity Aid for Cardiac arrests using simulation methodology. This task-focused team tool improved perceived team situation awareness, communication, and overall performance. The research highlights the interplay between task- and teamwork in healthcare settings, underscoring the potential for taskwork-oriented tools to benefit team dynamics. These findings warrant further investigation into team-supportive interventions and their impact on resuscitation outcomes.

Indexed as

Cognitive aidNon-technical skillsResuscitationShared mental modelSimulationTeam mental modelTeam performanceTeam reflectionTeam reflexivity

Identifiers

PMID40156074
PMCPMC11951662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.