Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40156066›Full record

SynthesisStem cell research & therapy2025

Efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies in the treatment of perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lucas Guillo, Robinson Gravier Dumonceau, Mélanie Vélier, Mélanie Serrero, Fanny Grimaud, Florence Sabatier, Jérémy Magalon

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucas GuilloDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Marseille Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), Aix-Marseille University, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France. lucas.guillo690@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9024-8541
Robinson Gravier DumonceauAPHM, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM (Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale), ISSPAM, BioSTIC (Biostatistique et Technologies de l'Information et de la Communication), Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Mélanie VélierC2VN, INSERM UMR 1263, Faculté de Pharmacie de Marseille, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Mélanie SerreroDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Marseille Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), Aix-Marseille University, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France.
Fanny GrimaudDirection of Health Research, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), Marseille, France.
Florence SabatierC2VN, INSERM UMR 1263, Faculté de Pharmacie de Marseille, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Jérémy MagalonC2VN, INSERM UMR 1263, Faculté de Pharmacie de Marseille, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerianal lesions of Crohn's disease (CD) are complex and disabling conditions. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based therapies have emerged as an innovative approach in managing refractory perianal fistulizing CD. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to describe and compare combined remission and clinical outcomes of MSC-based therapies, and then whether one approach stands out from the rest.

methodsWe searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL (up to December 31, 2023) all prospective studies assessing a local injection of MSC-based therapy in perianal fistulas of CD. The primary outcome was achievement of combined remission. MSC-based therapy strategies were compared.

resultsTwenty-five studies were included in the meta-analysis, enrolling 596 patients with perianal fistulizing CD. The combined remission rate at 3, 6 and 12 months were 36.2% (95% confidence interval (CI), 24.5-49.7), 57.9% (95% CI 51.3-64.2) and 52% (95% CI 38.8-64.8), respectively. MSC-based therapies demonstrated a significant effect in achieving combined remission compared to placebo at 3 months (relative risk (RR) = 1.6; 95% CI 1.0-2.8) and at 6 months (RR = 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-1.9). At 6 months, the combined remission rate was 57.2% (95% CI 47.2-66.6) for adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) and 55.7% (95% CI 26.4-81.5) for bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs). In the network meta-analysis, allogeneic ASCs and BMSCs did not demonstrate superiority over each other (RR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.31-1.77).

conclusionMSC-based therapies are effective for achieving combined remission of refractory and/or complex perianal fistulizing CD. The optimal efficacy effect is reached after 6 months of treatment. No superiority has yet been demonstrated between ASCs and BMSCs therapies.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationRectal FistulaHumansTreatment OutcomeCrohn’s diseaseFistulaMesenchymal stem cellsMeta-analysisStromal vascular fraction

Identifiers

PMID40156066
PMCPMC11951560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.