Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40156060›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2025

WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Articles 9 and 10 implementation for sustainable tobacco control-a scoping review protocol.

Sonu Goel, Diksha Walia, Priyobrat Rajkhowa, Chirag Goel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sonu GoelSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. Sonugoel007@yahoo.co.in.
Diksha WaliaDepartment of Community Medicine and School for Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, PGIMER Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India.
Priyobrat RajkhowaDepartment of Community Medicine and School for Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, PGIMER Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India.
Chirag GoelDepartment of Community Medicine and School for Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, PGIMER Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTobacco consumption continues to pose a substantial global public health threat, resulting in more than 8 million preventable deaths annually. The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) negotiated as the first global public health treaty under the auspices of the WHO, which serves as a critical instrument in combating the global tobacco epidemic. The WHO FCTC prioritizes a comprehensive approach that addresses both the demand for and supply side interventions for curbing tobacco epidemic globally. Strong evidence demonstrates the efficacy of these measures in safeguarding individuals, regardless of age, from tobacco initiation, and the associated harms. WHO FCTC Article 9 and 10 emphasizes upon testing and disclosure of tobacco product contents. This scoping review aims to explore the Implementation Landscape of WHO FCTC Articles 9 and 10 globally by adopting Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework.

methodsThe planned scoping review will adhere to the methodology outlined by "Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al." Through an exhaustive search strategy, relevant literature published from 2013 onwards will be sourced from databases including PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, government websites, and reports. A predetermined set of criteria for study inclusion and exclusion will be applied independently by four reviewers to assess study eligibility. The findings will be synthesized narratively and qualitatively analyzed, incorporating the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework for discussion and outlining. The review will adhere to the reporting standards outlined in the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR)" guidelines. CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSION: Analyzing the implementation of FCTC Articles 9 and 10 across global contexts is expected to offer valuable insights into the need for context-specific adjustments and customized interventions. Understanding regional variations in efforts to regulate tobacco products is crucial for formulating specific strategies that effectively address cultural, economic, and regulatory challenges. This comparative examination has the potential to guide policymakers, public health professionals, and researchers in optimizing tobacco control initiatives to expedite progress toward effective implementation of Articles 9 and 10 in both the WHO-SEAR region and globally. ETHICS APPROVAL: This review will identify the landscape of the implementation of WHO FCTC Article 9 and 10. This review will also identify the best practices, policies, and strategies across the globe. An ethics committee approval was not sought for this since this involve secondary data.

Indexed as

Smoking PreventionTobacco ProductsGlobal HealthHumansPublic HealthScoping Reviews as TopicTobacco ControlWorld Health OrganizationImplementationStrategyTobacco product testing and disclosuresWHO-FCTCWHO FCTC-Article 9 and 10

Identifiers

PMID40156060
PMCPMC11951582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.