ArticleGenome biology2025
Benchmarking spatial transcriptomics technologies with the multi-sample SpatialBenchVisium dataset.
Article in Genome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- DPAS-Graph: adaptive spatial-feature relation learning for spatial RNA-to-protein prediction and virtual protein profiling.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Review
- Biased multi-view contrastive learning with attentive masking for spatial transcriptomic analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Atlas-Guided Nanocarrier Strategies Targeting Spatial NTRK2/MAPK Signaling in EGFR-TKI-Resistant Niches of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Spatiotemporal dynamics of tumor-associated neutrophils: bridging the gap between cancer progression and immunotherapy.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Advances in Spatial Transcriptomics in Bone.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026Review
- Decoding cardiac homeostasis and injury: the evolving landscape of spatial transcriptomics.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Systematic evaluation of spatial transcriptomic annotation methods reveals conserved tumor microenvironment programs in NSCLC.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Spatial Omics in Gastrointestinal Oncology: Recent Advances, Therapeutic Insights, and Clinical Translation.Journal of Cancer · 2026Review
- Spatial AI in cancer: mapping immune evasion topology through multi-modal omics and deep learning.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- stPipe: a flexible and streamlined R/Bioconductor pipeline for preprocessing sequencing-based spatial transcriptomics data.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Current Role and Future Frontiers of Spatial Transcriptomics in Genitourinary Cancers.Cancers · 2025Review
- High-definition spatial transcriptomic profiling of immune cell populations in colorectal cancer.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- Transcriptome analysis of archived tumors by Visium, GeoMx DSP, and Chromium reveals patient heterogeneity.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Integrating spatial omics with routine haematoxylin and eosin in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded: a step-by-step clinical workflow.F1000Research · 2025Review
- Dissecting the intratumoral microbiome landscape in lung cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpatial transcriptomics allows gene expression to be measured within complex tissue contexts. Among the array of spatial capture technologies available is 10x Genomics' Visium platform, a popular method which enables transcriptome-wide profiling of tissue sections. Visium offers a range of sample handling and library construction methods which introduces a need for benchmarking to compare data quality and assess how well the technology can recover expected tissue features and biological signatures.
resultsHere we present SpatialBenchVisium, a unique reference dataset generated from spleen tissue of mice responding to malaria infection spanning several tissue preparation protocols (both fresh frozen and FFPE, with either manual or CytAssist tissue placement). We note better quality control metrics in reference samples prepared using probe-based capture methods, particularly those processed with CytAssist, validating the improvement in data quality produced with the platform. Our analysis of replicate samples extends to explore spatially variable gene detection, the outcomes of clustering and cell deconvolution using matched single-cell RNA-sequencing data and publicly available reference data to identify cell types and tissue regions expected in the spleen. Multi-sample differential expression analysis recovered known gene signatures related to biological sex or gene knockout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.