ArticleBMC chemistry2025
Chemometric-assisted UV spectrophotometric methods for determination of miconazole nitrate and lidocaine hydrochloride along with potential impurity and dosage from preservatives.
Article in BMC chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- "Green spectrophotometric determination of rupatadine, its toxic impurity, and methyl paraben: comparative AI-assisted univariate versus multivariate chemometrics".Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Simultaneous ecofriendly HPLC determination of clotrimazole, miconazole, metronidazole, and lidocaine in pharmaceutical dosage forms.BMC chemistry · 2026Article
- Innovate sodium alginate microneedle patches integrated with soft lidocaine invasomes: advanced strategies for oral ulcerative mucositis treatment via TNF-α/NF-κB pathways.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three accurate, simple, and precise chemometric techniques, principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares (PLS), and backward interval partial least squares (biPLS) were used to resolve the severely overlapped UV spectra of miconazole nitrate (MIC) and Lidocaine hydrochloride (LDC) along with the toxic impurity of LDC; dimethyl aniline (DMA) and the two inactive ingredients; methyl paraben (MTP) and saccharin sodium (SAC). The concentration ranges of the developed models were found to be (2.40-12.00 µg/mL) for LDC and MIC, (1.50-7.50 µg/mL) for DMA and MTP, and (2.00-6.00 µg/mL) for SAC. The proposed methods were found to be green, rapid, and were effectively used to analyze the studied compounds in both laboratory-prepared mixtures and antifungal oral gel, where no impurity was detected. The obtained results revealed that PLS algorithm was superior to PCR depending on the lowest root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) and correlation coefficient values (r). The biPLS model, constructed with [3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9] subintervals, is considered the most efficient model with the lowest number of latent variables. biPLS is ideal for data analysis and enhancing model performance and robustness by focusing on the most relevant spectral regions. When compared to a reported HPLC method, the proposed methods showed non-significant difference regarding accuracy and precision. The developed models often yield faster results than HPLC. Once the model is built, it takes no time to predict multiple samples without requiring reconstruction, in addition, the proposed models minimize the costs of solvents and equipment compared to HPLC, making them a valuable option for quality control laboratories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.