ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2025
Generate what you can make: achieving in-house synthesizability with readily available resources in de novo drug design.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep generative models for 3D structure-based drug design and molecular optimisation: a comprehensive survey.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- Recent Progress in the Development of Selective MAGL Modulators (2020-2026).Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Generative Deep Learning for de Novo Drug Design─A Chemical Space Odyssey.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Review
- Integrating Pharmacokinetics and Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches in Generative Drug Design.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Advances in the study and application of digital technology in the clinical practice of atopic dermatitis.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computer-Aided Synthesis Planning (CASP) and CASP-based approximated synthesizability scores have rarely been used as generation objectives in Computer-Aided Drug Design despite facilitating the in-silico generation of synthesizable molecules. However, these synthesizability approaches are disconnected from the reality of small laboratory drug design, where building block resources are limited, thus making the notion of in-house synthesizability with already available resources highly desirable. In this work, we show a successful in-house de novo drug design workflow generating active and in-house synthesizable ligands of monoglyceride lipase (MGLL). First, we demonstrate the successful transfer of CASP from 17.4 million commercial building blocks to a small laboratory setting of roughly 6000 building blocks with only a decrease of -12% in CASP success when accepting two reaction-steps longer synthesis routes on average. Next, we present a rapidly retrainable in-house synthesizability score, successfully capturing our in-house synthesizability without relying on external building block resources. We show that including our in-house synthesizability score in a multi-objective de novo drug design workflow, alongside a simple QSAR model, provides thousands of potentially active and easily in-house synthesizable molecules. Finally, we experimentally evaluate the synthesis and biochemical activity of three de novo candidates using their CASP-suggested synthesis routes employing only in-house building blocks. We find one candidate with evident activity, suggesting potential new ligand ideas for MGLL inhibitors while showcasing the usefulness of our in-house synthesizability score for de novo drug design.Scientific contribution Our core scientific contribution is the introduction of in-house de novo drug design, which enables the practical application of generative methods in small laboratories by utilizing a limited stock of available building blocks. Our fast-to-adapt workflow for in-house synthesizability scoring requires minimal computational retraining costs while supporting a high diversity of generated structures. We highlight the practicality of our approach through a comprehensive in-vitro case study that relies entirely on in-house resources, including in-silico generation, synthesis planning, and activity evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.