ArticleBMC biotechnology2025
Extract optimization and biological activities of Otidea onotica using Artificial Neural Network-Genetic Algorithm and response surface methodology techniques.
Article in BMC biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenolic content and biological activities of Lenzites betulina extracts obtained by ultrasonic-assisted optimization approaches.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted optimization of extraction enhances the biological activity of Phylloporia ribis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction Process ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Geographical variation in antioxidant, anticancer and anticholinesterase activities and phenolic contents of Visnaga daucoides.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Regulation and induction of fungal secondary metabolites: a comprehensive review.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, the biological activities of Otidea onotica were investigated using two optimization methods, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Artificial Neural Network-Genetic Algorithm (ANN-GA). The extracts were tested for phenolic content, antioxidant potential, acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activities and antiproliferative effects against A549 lung cancer cell line. The results show that the extracts obtained by ANN-GA optimization exhibited higher antioxidant activity compared to RSM extracts and had higher total antioxidant status (TAS), DPPH and FRAP values. Phenolic content analysis revealed eight phenolic compounds and the compounds with the highest concentrations were caffeic acid (in RSM extract) and gallic acid (in ANN-GA extract), respectively. Both extracts showed strong cytotoxic effects against A549 cells depending on the concentration, with ANN-GA extract showing higher antiproliferative activity. Our study provides important findings on the biological activities and therapeutic potential of O. onotica and particularly reveals that the ANN-GA optimization method plays an important role in increasing biological activity. The findings show that O. onotica extracts can be used in the treatment of cancer and neurodegenerative diseases in the future and that optimization techniques offer an effective strategy for enriching phenolic contents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.