ArticleBMC oral health2025
Assessment of knowledge on traumatized immature permanent teeth among dentists in China: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dental practitioners' knowledge, attitudes, practices, and perceived barriers regarding oral health care of women during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Delayed Management of Concurrent Coronal Extrusions and Root Fractures in Two Traumatized Maxillary Immature Permanent Central Incisors: A Case Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMedical practice is always based upon the cognition and knowledge base of physicians, and the same applies to dentistry. Being attained through education and perception, knowledge is essential to clinical practice. Cross-sectional studies have recognized a uniform trend in which the treatment of traumatic dental injuries (TDIs) is of suboptimal quality in China: is a lack of knowledge a problem, or do some relevant factors of dentists have a significant effect on obtaining TDI treatment knowledge? The purpose was to measure dentists' knowledge of TDI treatment and investigate whether some relevant factors have indeed affected their knowledge of TDI treatment.
methodAn online-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 1027 dentists in Guangxi Province via a cluster sampling technique. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including frequency, percentage, t test, ANOVA test and linear analysis, were obtained. The results were interpreted via tables and graphs.
resultsStudies that measured dentists' knowledge of TDI treatment, which was valuable, reliable, and had practical implications that could be implemented. A total of 1027 questionnaires from 14 main districts in Guangxi were used to measure the knowledge level of local dentists and potential influencing factors via 40 questions at 20 TDI treatment-related points.
conclusionFindings from the present study revealed that the degree of knowledge among dentists in Guangxi regarding the treatment of traumatized immature permanent teeth is moderate. The findings further revealed a significant relationship between factors such as sex, education level, professional title, and the workplace of dentists and higher scores on the questionnaire (P < 0.001). THE CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: of the TDI treatment knowledge of dentists in Guangxi Province was found to be moderate and variable. This may limit the quality of effective treatment. However, providing information without attention to differences among dentists caused by influencing factors that significantly affect dentists' cognitions and motivations may not be successful. Educational strategies and goals should be re-evaluated, and relevant continuing education measures should be tailored to local conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.