SynthesisBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Automatically titrating oxygen system versus constant flow oxygen system during exercise in patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHypoxemia is a common symptom among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The constant flow oxygen system (CFOS) is often insufficient to correct this symptom. The automatically titrating oxygen system (ATOS), a new oxygen therapy mode, remains undetermined in its ability to improve exercise performance more effectively than CFOS in COPD patients. The main objective of this meta-analysis was to explore this issue.
methodsWe conducted a thorough search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (from inception to 1 November 2024). Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by two authors. Data synthesis was conducted using Stata software (Version 17.0). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was utilized to rate evidence quality.
resultsFive eligible studies (n = 120) were included. Compared to CFOS, ATOS was more effective in extending the distance (MD = 180.28 m, 95%CI:133.03 to 227.52) and duration (MD = 237.63 s, 95%CI: 181.18 to 294.07) of endurance shuttle walking test (ESWT). Besides, ATOS could better prolong the percentage time of sustaining targeted SpO DISCUSSION: ATOS may have more advantages in improving exercise tolerance, sustaining targeted SpO CLINICAL
trial registrationThe review was registered with PROSPERO (The website is https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prosp ero/, and the ID is CRD 42024574955) and we didn't make a protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.