ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Retained crystal ball in pediatric gastrointestinal tract: a cautionary case report.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric Water Bead Ingestion: Experience from a Quaternary Care Children's Hospital and a Proposed Management Algorithm.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2026Article
- Superabsorbent polymer beads ingestion by children: a single-center retrospective study of 11 cases.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDecorative crystal balls, also known as superabsorbent polymer gel beads, pose a significant hazard when ingested due to their ability to expand upon exposure to water. Diagnosing crystal ball ingestion remains challenging because of their transparency to radiation, making them difficult to visualize using X-ray imaging. Small crystal balls may not be detected in their early stages, only becoming visible once they fully swell and cause intestinal obstruction. This often results in some crystal balls remaining in the distal intestine after primary surgery aimed at removing the proximal crystals. CASE PRESENTATION: A 2-year-old girl was referred to our hospital with persistent vomiting and fever. She was diagnosed with acute intestinal obstruction, and imaging revealed features of dynamic obstruction. Emergency laparotomy identified an obstruction in the mid-terminal ileum caused by a superabsorbent polymer gel bead (crystal ball). A jelly-like mass measuring 4x4.5 cm was removed and sent for histopathological examination. Intestinal anastomosis was performed during the initial surgery to restore bowel continuity. Postoperatively, complications arose, including infection in the abdominal cavity and breakdown of the anastomosed area. A previously missed gel bead, referred to as "crystal baby," which had not been identified during the initial surgery, caused severe leakage and infection. Given the high risk of further anastomotic complications, a double-lumen ileostomy was performed. The child's condition improved, and follow-up imaging one month after surgery revealed no further obstruction.
conclusionThis case highlights the diagnostic and surgical challenges associated with crystal balls (superabsorbent polymer gel beads) and emphasizes the need for careful management to prevent severe complications. It also underscores the risks of intestinal anastomosis in such cases and the necessity of alternative approaches, such as ileostomy, to ensure better outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.