ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP): a prognostic biomarker for gastric cancer linked to immune infiltration.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A prognostic 19-gene signature and LBP-mediated immune dysregulation define the tumor microenvironment in poor-prognosis KIRC.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Plasma Protein Biomarkers to Detect Early Gastric Preneoplasia and Cancer: A Prospective Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric cancer, characterized by rising global incidence and mortality, faces significant challenges due to the lack of effective early detection methods, delaying timely interventions and underscoring the need for novel biomarkers. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), implicated in cancers such as lung, colon, and cervical cancer, has emerged as a promising candidate. However, its specific roles and mechanisms in gastric cancer remain unclear, necessitating further investigation.
methodsThis study utilized data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), and the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) to assess LBP mRNA and protein expression levels in gastric cancer patients and explore their associations with clinical outcomes. Analytical techniques included volcano plots, protein-protein interaction networks, Gene Ontology (GO) analysis, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), and immune infiltration assessments. Furthermore, lentiviral vectors containing interference sequences targeting LBP were used to manipulate its expression in AGS and HGC-27 gastric cancer cell lines, enabling the analysis of gene knockdown effects on malignant behaviors. Western blotting (WB) was performed to validate the impact of LBP knockdown on the expression of key signaling pathway proteins.
resultsOur pan-cancer comparative analysis across 33 cancer types revealed significant upregulation of LBP in gastric cancer, with diagnostic ROC curve analysis yielding an AUC of 0.765. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that high LBP expression was inversely related to patient survival. Additionally, immune infiltration and functional enrichment analyses revealed the involvement of LBP in pathways crucial to cancer development, such as immune response modulation and lipid metabolism. LBP knockdown in gastric cancer cell lines reduced proliferation, migration, and invasion. WB confirmed decreased expression of P65, P-P65, STAT3, and P-STAT3 upon LBP knockdown.
conclusionLBP is intricately linked to gastric cancer pathogenesis; it influences cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, thereby representing a valuable prognostic and diagnostic biomarker. This study not only highlights the potential of LBP as a therapeutic target but also provides the groundwork for future investigations into its mechanistic pathways in gastric cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable. I would like to clarify that our research does not fall under clinical studies and therefore does not involve ethical concerns related to human or animal subjects. The cells used in this study are established cell lines purchased from a certified biotechnology company. All experimental procedures comply with standard research protocols and guidelines for cell line studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.