Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40155816›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

General practitioners' attitudes and barriers to patient activation in cardiovascular disease prevention: insights from the DECADE study.

Willy Gräfe, Iris Tinsel, Maja Börger, Thomas Kloppe, Andy Maun, Henna Riemenschneider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Willy GräfeDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. willy.graefe@ukdd.de.
Iris TinselSection of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Medical Faculty and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Maja BörgerInstitute of General Practice/Family Medicine, Medical Faculty and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Thomas KloppeDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Andy MaunInstitute of General Practice/Family Medicine, Medical Faculty and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Henna RiemenschneiderDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the most common cause of death in Germany. General practitioners (GPs) have an important role in supporting patients in the prevention of CVD. The DECADE intervention was developed to encourage patients to improve self-management in order to prevent CVD, addressing both GPs and patients. This study focused on GPs attitudes towards patient activation and its relation to the level of activation on their patients, possible barriers according to lifestyle counselling and attitudes towards interprofessional consultations.

methodsQuestionnaire-based cross-sectional analysis was conducted within the DECADE-cRCT. GPs attitudes to patient activation was measured by using seven items of the Clinician Support for Patient Activation Measure (CS-PAM). The degree of activation of the patients was measured by Patient Activation Measure (PAM13-D). The Barriers and attitudes towards responsibilities for lifestyle counselling were assessed using self-generated items on a 5-point Likert scale. Association between CS-PAM and PAM13-D was analysed using a linear mixed model.

results79/82 GPs responded. Mean CS-PAM score of GPs at baseline was 23.00 (range 13-27, max. 28). GPs reported lack of time, funding and uncertainty of the impact as main barriers to the routine implementation of lifestyle counselling. GPs see themselves as primarily responsible for conducting lifestyle counselling, but they also emphasize the importance of interprofessional cooperation. No significant correlations between CS-PAM and PAM13-D were found.

conclusionGPs perceive patient activation as important. Most GPs reported that they already provide lifestyle counselling as part of their routine practice. Overcoming the identified barriers in GPs lifestyle counselling is a prerequisite for effective and patient-centred consultation on cardiovascular risk factors. The interprofessional collaboration advocated by GPs could relieve the burden on GPs and thus reduce these barriers. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: The DECADE-study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00025401; Trial registration date: 2021/06/21) and in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP): https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=DRKS00025401 .

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCardiovascular DiseasesGeneral PractitionersPatient ParticipationAdultCounselingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesCardiovascular diseasesLifestyle counsellingPatient activationPreventionPrimary careSelf-management

Identifiers

PMID40155816
PMCPMC11951579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.