Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40155806›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Facilitators and barriers faced by community organizations supporting older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Kristen R Haase, Ailsa C Sirois, Dmitri Detwyler, Bahareh Kardeh, Shelley Peacock, Theodore D Cosco, Marjan Kamali, Megan E O'Connell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kristen R HaaseSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Applied Science, University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada.
Ailsa C SiroisSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Applied Science, University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada. ailsa.sirois@ubc.ca.
Dmitri DetwylerDepartment of Applied Linguistics and ESL, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.
Bahareh KardehFaculty of Medicine, Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Shelley PeacockCollege of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Theodore D CoscoSchool of Gerontology Research Centre, Department of Gerontology, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada.
Marjan KamaliSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Applied Science, University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada.
Megan E O'ConnellDepartment of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, olderadult-focused community organizations played an essential role in supporting the wellbeing of older adults. Supporting older adults during this time required extensive modifications to existing programming but their adaptations during the COVID-19 pandemic are not well documented. The purpose of this study was to understand how older adult-focused community organizations adopted virtual delivery formats during the COVID-19 pandemic and their perspectives of the barriers and facilitators for organizations and older adults.

methodsTo understand the changes that were made, we conducted a qualitative environmental scan of community-based services across British Columbia. Online searches were complemented by snowball sampling and key informant interviews. We identified 90 older adult-serving community organizations and interviewed 26. We used reflexive thematic analysis to understand the main strategies.

resultsThese community organizations described barriers related to older adults' wellbeing, information technology proficiency, and personal/organizational losses related to changes in program structure. Facilitators for virtual activities and events included inter- and intra-organizational collaboration, intrinsic qualities of program design, physical resources to supporting virtual programming, and availability of technological resources. Organizations described meeting the challenge by increasing the 'depth' and 'breadth' of their reach.

conclusionOlder adult-focused community organizations recognized the critical role they played for older adults and adapted their resources to meet those needs. Informational technology was quickly and effectively leveraged to promote social interaction for older adults when physical distancing was required during the COVID-19 pandemic. Barriers related to cost, time, and ultimately older adults' interest in a virtual delivery format were critical limitations.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesCOVID-19AgedAged, 80 and overBritish ColumbiaFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2AgingCommunity organizationsCOVID-19Information technology

Identifiers

PMID40155806
PMCPMC11951528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.