Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40155798›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2025

High performance imputation of structural and single nucleotide variants using low-coverage whole genome sequencing.

Manu Kumar Gundappa, Diego Robledo, Alastair Hamilton, Ross D Houston, James G D Prendergast, Daniel J Macqueen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Structural Variant Imputation in Samoans Using a Population-Specific Reference Panel.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deep learning for genomic selection of aquatic animals.Marine life science & technology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manu Kumar GundappaAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands. manu.gundappa@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4328-2178
Diego RobledoThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
Alastair HamiltonHendrix Genetics, Villa 'de Körver', Spoorstraat, 695831 CK, Boxmeer, The Netherlands.
Ross D HoustonThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
James G D PrendergastThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
Daniel J MacqueenThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.

Funding

BBSRC BB/S004181/1 (DJM)BBSRC BBS/E/D/30002275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhole genome sequencing (WGS), despite its advantages, is yet to replace methods for genotyping single nucleotide variants (SNVs) such as SNP arrays and targeted genotyping assays. Structural variants (SVs) have larger effects on traits than SNVs, but are more challenging to accurately genotype. Using low-coverage WGS with genotype imputation offers a cost-effective strategy to achieve genome-wide variant coverage, but is yet to be tested for SVs.

methodsHere, we investigate combined SNV and SV imputation with low-coverage WGS data in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). As the reference panel, we used genotypes for high-confidence SVs and SNVs for n = 365 wild individuals sampled from diverse populations. We also generated 15 × WGS data (n = 20 samples) for a commercial population external to the reference panel, and called SVs and SNVs with gold-standard approaches. An imputation method selected for its established performance using low-coverage sequencing data (GLIMPSE) was tested at WGS depths of 1 × , 2 × , 3 × , and 4 × for samples within and external to the reference panel.

resultsSNVs were imputed with high accuracy and recall across all WGS depths, including for samples out-with the reference panel. For SVs, we compared imputation based purely on linkage disequilibrium (LD) with SNVs, to that supplemented with SV genotype likelihoods (GLs) from low-coverage WGS. Including SV GLs increased imputation accuracy, but as a trade-off with recall, requiring 3-4 × depth for best performance. Combining strategies allowed us to capture 84% of the reference panel deletions with 87% accuracy at 1 × depth. We also show that SV length affects imputation performance, with provision of SV GLs greatly enhancing accuracy for the longest SVs in the dataset.

conclusionsThis study highlights the promise of reference panel imputation using low-coverage WGS, including novel opportunities to enhance the resolution of genome-wide association studies by capturing SVs.

Indexed as

Genomic Structural VariationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSalmo salarWhole Genome SequencingAnimalsGenotype

Identifiers

PMID40155798
PMCPMC11951665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.