ArticleBMC genomics2025
Deciphering the molecular transcriptomic mechanisms of carbon ion beams and X-ray on rice seedlings.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIonizing radiation (IR) is an abiotic stress factor that can be not only a means to explore plant resistance but also a potent mutagen in agricultural breeding. The diverse physical parameters of different types of IR result in varying effects on plants, which in turn leads to differences in the spectrum of genetic variations in the offspring. Investigating plant response mechanisms to different IR is crucial for enhancing plant resistance and comprehending of the differences in mutation generation from various physical mutagenic sources in mutation breeding. Nevertheless, the mechanism underlying the complex responses of plants to different IR are not yet fully comprehended.
resultswe conducted transcriptome sequencing on rice seedlings that exhibited a relative root length of approximately 69% after being exposed to carbon ion beams (CIBs) and X-ray respectively. The results revealed that X-ray induced a greater number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) than CIBs, with 5681 and 2198 DEGs were identified respectively. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses indicated that DNA replication, damage repair, phytohormone signaling, and antioxidant pathways were implicated in the response of rice seedling to IR. These pathways demonstrated diverse response patterns following different IR. Additionally, through two IR with different linear energy transfer (LET), we found some common DEGs that contribute to the radiation response in rice seedlings, such as LOC4331062, LOC4333870.
conclusionThis study offers insights into the molecular transcriptomic mechanisms underlying the impacts of IR on rice seedlings. It provides a new perspective for further exploration of irradiation-induced damage repair factors and understanding the reasons for the differences in mutations created by different mutagenic sources in plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.