ArticleScientific reports2025
Augmented reality-based radial and lateral motion stimuli alter aiming performance in dart throwing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study used an augmented reality (AR) head-mounted display to generate three-dimensional (3D) perceived motions involving optic flow and evaluated their effects on aiming motor skill in dart throwing. The motions were generated by random white spheres moving in 3D space. Six motion patterns were assessed: random, lateral, radial expansion, radial contraction, combined random and radial expansion, and diagonal radial expansion. The effects of these motion patterns on aiming accuracy were compared to a control condition lacking sphere motions. We observed significant effects of radial expansion and contraction motions, as well as lateral motion, but not of the other motions. The radial expansion and lateral motions biased the dart positions, whereas the radial contraction motion reduced lateral variance. These findings imply that AR-based perceived motion has the potential to enhance motor skills by reducing error and variance. Therefore, although other types of motion may also exert effects, this study provides a basis for further research on AR-based illusions of motion perception.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.