ReviewNature protocols2025
Tutorial: guidelines for quality filtering of whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing data for population-scale association analyses.
Review in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- WxS-QC-a quality control pipeline for human germline short-variant Whole-Genome and Whole-Exome cohorts for population-scale analyses.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Exome sequencing directly implicates 68 genes in inflammatory bowel disease.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Cystic fibrosis risk variants confer protection against inflammatory bowel disease.Cell genomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic sequencing technologies are powerful tools for identifying rare variants and genes associated with Mendelian and complex traits; indeed, whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing are increasingly popular methods for population-scale genetic studies. However, careful quality control steps should be taken to ensure study accuracy and reproducibility, and sequencing data require extensive quality filtering to delineate true variants from technical artifacts. Although processing standards are harmonized across pipelines to call variants from sequencing reads, there currently exists no standardized pipeline for conducting quality filtering on variant-level datasets for the purpose of population-scale association analysis. In this Tutorial, we discuss key quality control parameters, provide guidelines for conducting quality filtering of samples and variants, and compare commonly used software programs for quality control of samples, variants and genotypes from sequencing data. As sequencing data continue to gain popularity in genetic research, establishing standardized quality control practices is crucial to ensure consistent, reliable and reproducible results across studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40155705What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.