ArticleScientific reports2025
Functional and structural analysis of SITTER patients with spinal muscular atrophy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, three disease-modifying therapies have been approved and fully reimbursed in Poland since September 2023. Those therapies have significantly improved the disease outcome but led to new uncertainties. Doubts mainly concern older patients who have already developed complications occurring because of a lack of previous access to therapy. Joint contractures or trunk deformation are the most noticeable changes that should be examined. This work examines functional and structural changes in SMA sitter patients between the ages of 5 and 20 years during the 12-month follow-up. Twenty-one SMA patients were divided depending on the drug program in which they participated. The study protocol included functional and structural assessments. Most of the subjects experienced an improvement in cervical rotation parameter and increased contracture of the hip and knee joints. There are differences between the patients' body sides. Neither the contractures nor their gradual decrease or increase occur symmetrically. We conclude that all patients under study improved their motor function after 12 months. In both groups, more significant improvement occurred in the assessment of the RULM scale than in the HFMSE scale. Improvement in function was not dependent on improvement in structural parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.