ArticleCommunications biology2025
Enhancing nucleotide sequence representations in genomic analysis with contrastive optimization.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A unified benchmark of supervised and retrieval-based methods for viral genomic sequence classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- In Silico Design and Characterization of the Essential Outer-Membrane Lipoprotein LolB-Derived Multi-Epitope Vaccine Candidate AgainstMethods and protocols · 2026Article
- Article
- Regulating genome language models: navigating policy challenges at the intersection of AI and genetics.Human genetics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analysis of genomic and metagenomic sequences is inherently more challenging than that of amino acid sequences due to the higher divergence among evolutionarily related nucleotide sequences, variable k-mer and codon usage within and among genomes of diverse species, and poorly understood selective constraints. We introduce Scorpio (Sequence Contrastive Optimization for Representation and Predictive Inference on DNA), a versatile framework designed for nucleotide sequences that employ contrastive learning to improve embeddings. By leveraging pre-trained genomic language models and k-mer frequency embeddings, Scorpio demonstrates competitive performance in diverse applications, including taxonomic and gene classification, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene identification, and promoter detection. A key strength of Scorpio is its ability to generalize to novel DNA sequences and taxa, addressing a significant limitation of alignment-based methods. Scorpio has been tested on multiple datasets with DNA sequences of varying lengths (long and short) and shows robust inference capabilities. Additionally, we provide an analysis of the biological information underlying this representation, including correlations between codon adaptation index as a gene expression factor, sequence similarity, and taxonomy, as well as the functional and structural information of genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.