ArticleScientific reports2025
Colonial bacterial memetic algorithm and its application on a darts playing robot.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- LS-BMO-HDBSCAN as a hybrid memetic bacterial intelligence framework for efficient data clustering.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we present the Colonial Bacterial Memetic Algorithm (CBMA), an advanced evolutionary optimization approach for robotic applications. CBMA extends the Bacterial Memetic Algorithm by integrating Cultural Algorithms and co-evolutionary dynamics inspired by bacterial group behavior. This combination of natural and artificial evolutionary elements results in a robust algorithm capable of handling complex challenges in robotics, such as constraints, multiple objectives, large search spaces, and complex models, while delivering fast and accurate solutions. CBMA incorporates features like multi-level clustering, dynamic gene selection, hierarchical population clustering, and adaptive co-evolutionary mechanisms, enabling efficient management of task-specific parameters and optimizing solution quality while minimizing resource consumption. The algorithm's effectiveness is demonstrated through a real-world robotic application, achieving a 100% success rate in a robot arm's ball-throwing task usually with significantly fewer iterations and evaluations compared to other methods. CBMA was also evaluated using the CEC-2017 benchmark suite, where it consistently outperformed state-of-the-art optimization algorithms, achieving superior outcomes in 71% of high-dimensional cases and demonstrating up to an 80% reduction in required evaluations. These results highlight CBMA's efficiency, adaptability, and suitability for specialized tasks. Overall, CBMA exhibits exceptional performance in both real-world and benchmark evaluations, effectively balancing exploration and exploitation, and representing a significant advancement in adaptive evolutionary optimization for robotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.